The 2019 Cop25 Paris Climate Accord

 ends in Failure

Should we be surprised ?

 

A key to understanding the Paris Climate Talks is to look at the very name of it more closely.

Firstly it is run by the United Nations (hiding under another name of the UNFCCC ) which had its first meeting in London and now how its headquarters in New York.

The Paris climate talks of 2015 were held in Paris the capital of France.

France has 58 Nuclear power stations and makes 3 billion Euro a year in exporting electricity.

It gets a lot of Uranium from Niger a former French Colony. Niger has no Uranium reactor. Niger is one of the poorest countries in the world and France earns about 3 billion Euro a year in electricity exports. France also makes about $500 Billion a year in colonial tax from Africa.

So the Paris Climate talks do not mention any thing about Frances purchase of Uranium from Niger or its $500 Billion income yearly from Africa. This crime against humanity of extraction of resources from a previous colony without the permission of the general population of Niger and load repayment interest is not mentioned in the Paris Climate talks .

France can continue this extreme exploitation of one of the poorest countries in the world without worry as it does not show up on Co2 emissions.

However in a larger picture this system of central nucleus countries relying on satellite countries for cheap labor and resources  creates huge powerful Governments and multi national corporations who maintain the Global Economy in its present structure. Multi National corporations have shareholders who require profit.  These shareholders do not see the pollution to the ground water surrounding major mining operations in far off countries- all they check is their stock prices hence the need of de – centralization of resources so local people own the industries in their regions.  This multi national structure of business is what is leading the planet into an unknown area of ecological disasters. The Paris Climate accord mentions nothing about shareholders of multi national stocks

The Paris Climate accord tries to limit the CO2 emissions but it does not say anything about limiting the bonuses of CEO’s and stopping exploiting the previous colonial   countries by the 1st World looting countries.

This is the whole point of the Paris Climate talks that is to create a diversion from the exploitation of multi national corporations by keeping the attention on CO2 Emissions

For the Looting countries the Paris Climate Talks have been a great successful in that there corporations continue business as usual. Nobody should be surprised when the Paris Climate talks end in disaster because they were designed to give the impression of trying to change the world but then just failing at the last moment to agree.

The Paris Climate talks are just bogus fake talks where the people involved even make a wage from fooling the people .Since the talks were a failure why don’t the people involved give back the wage they received  for attending the talks ? – If the talks were a success they would loss there income! As the planet would be saved but they never will be a success . The next Paris talks were ever it is held will be a failure and the ones after that then soon they will change its name just as the Kyoto Protocol became the Paris Climate Agreement then they can start all over again.

Solutions

The first 2 really important policies to implement is a maximum wage of no more that 10 times the minimum wage and a ban on export of raw materials followed by nationalization of basic necessaries such as oil, medium sized coops and private individual businesses –with land reform and excess wealth redistribution  coming at the last point of a complete revolution of the economy .

 

Anything short of these economic revolutions  will result sooner or latter in the near extinction of our planet .

The extinction rebellion movement needs to keep its focus on these 4 economic revolutions and not become too abstract like the Paris Climate accord least they become a diversion rather than solution in the same way that the British used Gandhi to their own advantage.

Leading to the independence of India their were many anti imperialist hero’s in India so the British selected a pacifist one to become a household name as they preferred a non violent agitator to the violent ones as they are more easy to control.

The extinction rebellion will have to watch out that they are not used as a diversion from economic change by talking about abstract changes without clear policies such as a ban on export of raw materials or Max. wage

Even now India is still racked by economic in equalities as they could not shake off the British colonial system in the   running of their Government where as some of their more violent anti Imperialist hero’s might have been able to rid India of the corrupt British system of Government that is now run by Indians instead of the British.